Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You're better off not being a Mormon
North American Missions Board ^ | John

Posted on 11/21/2006 9:15:22 PM PST by southwilby

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
To: southwilby; Religion Moderator
Do you plan on being a god someday like mormons believe?

Around here, the Moderators are God - or at least think they are.

(Kidding!)

101 posted on 11/22/2006 9:40:52 AM PST by jude24 ("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines

>the official position of the SBC is that the LDS is merely not orthodox Christianity.<

That is the definition of a cult as it is used in Christianity.


102 posted on 11/22/2006 9:44:30 AM PST by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
they really know great architecture

Okay, now that one you'll have to back up. IMO Mormon architectural designs are horrendous.

103 posted on 11/22/2006 9:56:17 AM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Dear Torie,

This thread, actually, is pretty mild, as attack threads go. You really, really have to commit some extreme outrage in the Religion Forum against a religion to suffer even the mildest consequences. I've seen a poster denigrate the Mother of God by demeaningly discussing her toilet habits. That received an almost-rebuke of the mildest sort.

As long as one isn't directly attacking an individual FR poster, and as long as you're not intruding into a "protected thread," pretty much any ugly, evil attack is permitted here on the Religion Forum. I've taken the issue up with Management before, to absolutely no avail at all.

No, this thread is rather mild, in terms of Religion Forum attack standards.


sitetest


104 posted on 11/22/2006 10:15:45 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Torie; southwilby

We believe this the Church of Jesus Christ and all work is done on earth but in the end it is the Lord Jesus Christ who Judges!

IMHO

ROMANS CHAPTER 14

Avoid doubtful disputations and unrighteous judgment of each other—Every knee shall bow to Christ—Kingdom of God embraces righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.

1 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations.

2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs.
3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.

4 Who art thou that judgest another man’s servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand.

5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.

6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.

7 For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.

8 For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord’s.

9 For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.

10 But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.

11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.

12 So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God.

13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother’s way.

14 I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean.

15 But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died.

16 Let not then your good be evil spoken of:

17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.

18 For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men.

19 Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.

20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence.

21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.

22 Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he alloweth.

23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.


105 posted on 11/22/2006 12:13:21 PM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: southwilby

I don't know about prayed define prayed in this case and your source besides the work being done?

Do not confused work being done with desire!

Once the work is done vicariously it is up to the individual and the Lord Jesus Christ.

Just because the letter of the law is carried out, one should not read more into it!


106 posted on 11/22/2006 12:33:45 PM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: southwilby

Mitt Romney threads about his religion are o.k.

****

So this is what this is about you are afraid a Mormon might become president!

You should have posted this thread closer to the primary!


107 posted on 11/22/2006 12:39:48 PM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I think the chap just had the urge to type "Hitler," just because he could, and see what might ensue.

I thought bringing up Hitler meant you automatically lost the arguement. It's some kind of internet debate rule or something.

108 posted on 11/22/2006 12:43:05 PM PST by NeoCaveman (Have you thanked the rich person who subsidized your share of taxation today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Threads like these, and some of the remarks about our faith, mirror almost perfectly the unchristian religious atmosphere about 180 years ago, which drive a serious young man into the woods to pray for Gods guidance as to where the truth lay.

. . . [T]here was in the place where we lived an unusual excitement on the subject of religion. It commenced with the Methodists, but soon became general among all the sects in that region of country. . . . Some were contending for the Methodist faith, some for the Presbyterian, and some for the Baptist.

For, notwithstanding the great love which the converts to these different faiths expressed at the time of their conversion, and the great zeal manifested by the respective clergy, who were active in getting up and promoting this extraordinary scene of religious feeling, in order to have everybody converted, as they were pleased to call it, let them join what sect they pleased; yet when the converts began to file off, some to one party and some to another, it was seen that the seemingly good feelings of both the priests and the converts were more pretended than real; for a scene of great confusion and bad feeling ensued -- priest contending against priest, and convert against convert; so that all their good feelings one for another, if they ever had any, were entirely lost in a strife of words and a contest about opinions.

. . . .

My mind at times was greatly excited, the cry and tumult were so great and incessant. The Presbyterians were most decided against the Baptists and Methodists, and used all the powers of both reason and sophistry to prove their errors, or at least to make the people think they were in error. On the other hand, the Baptists and Methodists in their turn were equally zealous in endeavoring to establish their own tenets and disprove all others.

Joseph Smith asked God for the truth. He got an answer. Fortunately, some of my ancestors heard the message and believed.

I particularly like the story left by my great-great-grandfather, Eli Wiggill. He was an English settler in South Africa, and a part-time Methodist minister. He believed the doctrine which was, according to his memoirs, common among Methodists of his acquaintance, that the church which Christ had established would have to be restored. When the Mormon missionaries reached South Africa in the late 1850's, Eli recognized that the restoration had occurred, as did several of his friends and fellow Methodists.

He believed it. He left everything behind and migrated with his family to Utah.

I believe it. I've had too many experienes confirming it to ever deny it.

109 posted on 11/22/2006 12:48:02 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Italics ended too soon. They should continue until . . .disprove all others."
110 posted on 11/22/2006 12:50:00 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer

Joseph Smith asked God for the truth

There still is a need for many today to ask that same question to get "The Rest of the Story!" I being a convert was one of them among millions of converts!:)


111 posted on 11/22/2006 1:22:58 PM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: southwilby

I have tried both ways. I am much better off being a Mormon.

Here is one Mormon family you ought to get to know. Meet Mitt Romney and his family.

http://www.pbase.com/photoleon/image/70620865/original.jpg


112 posted on 11/22/2006 1:53:11 PM PST by Boisean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: All

The problem with arguing with a fool is that a passerby may not be able to tell the difference.


113 posted on 11/22/2006 3:32:02 PM PST by Boisean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I am hoping some of our Mormon friends will show up and debate this poster, as is the norm here. Thanks for your post.


114 posted on 11/22/2006 3:51:03 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: All

Once again I didn't read far enough!


115 posted on 11/22/2006 3:51:55 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Boisean
The problem with arguing with a fool is that a passerby may not be able to tell the difference.

Oh, that is great! A keeper!

116 posted on 11/22/2006 3:59:57 PM PST by ladyinred (RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: southwilby
You are nuts.

I am Mormon. I have NO idea what you are talking about ala Hitler.

No one ever in the history of Mormonism has ever taught nor has 'prayed' someone else into heaven.

You have any questions about Mormons direct them to me.

117 posted on 11/22/2006 4:50:43 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
You have any questions about Mormons direct them to me

What do Mormons eat for breakfast?

118 posted on 11/22/2006 6:10:50 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I think it is clear that I am NOT the Relgion Moderator. I might be a pretty good one, come to think of it, since I have no dog in the hunt. I just don't like contentless gratuitous metaphysical flames. And so it goes. :)


119 posted on 11/22/2006 8:44:58 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Dear Torie,

"I think it is clear that I am NOT the Religion Moderator."

LOL. Me, neither.


sitetest


120 posted on 11/22/2006 9:15:39 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson