Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; Frumanchu; Gamecock

The power plays and hatefulness of Dordt should mean that no fair person would take anything they said out of that context of power, hate, exile, and execution.

It makes me certain that their positions on scripture are unworthy of inclusion in serious Christian history.


72 posted on 11/15/2006 11:34:10 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
The power plays and hatefulness of Dordt should mean that no fair person would take anything they said out of that context of power, hate, exile, and execution.

What a convenient excuse to throw out the facts of history, xzins. I hear the same type of argument made by liberal Democrats all the time to dismiss the Reagan presidency.

An interesting change of tactics to be sure. Up until recently the whole affair was cast in doubt by the Remonstrants not being true to Arminius' views and teachings. Now suddenly the whole affair should cast in doubt because of the political surroundings at the time.

I suppose next we'll be asked to dismiss the Synod of Dordt because there was no vote taken to determine the Reformed delegates, or some other inane argument.

It makes me certain that their positions on scripture are unworthy of inclusion in serious Christian history.

See tagline.

Fair people have been including the Synod's position on Scripture in serious Christian history for hundreds of years.

75 posted on 11/15/2006 12:00:18 PM PST by Frumanchu (Historical Revisionism: When you're tired of being on the losing side of history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson