To: jude24
So why are we even talking about it? Think about it a second, Jude. Who here stands to gain from a trivialization and dismissal of the Synod of Dordt as now "determinative about anything?"
21 posted on
11/14/2006 7:16:56 AM PST by
Frumanchu
(Historical Revisionism: When you're tired of being on the losing side of history.)
To: Frumanchu
That should be "not" instead of "now"
23 posted on
11/14/2006 7:22:01 AM PST by
Frumanchu
(Historical Revisionism: When you're tired of being on the losing side of history.)
To: Frumanchu
Who here stands to gain from a trivialization and dismissal of the Synod of Dordt as now "determinative about anything?" Frankly, as a Calvinist, I don't need Dordt. Dordt didn't make me a Calvinist - the text (aided by a cascade of discussions with Calvinistically-minded persons) did. Dordt was a historical asterisk as far as I was concerned.
24 posted on
11/14/2006 7:23:43 AM PST by
jude24
("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson