Well, as you know the subject of grace itself can be as complex as one wishes to make it. In the broad sense, I think "grace" can be considered any aid from God. I think it is correct to say that God graced me by giving me my wife. I'm not saying I think that's how it is presented in the WCF, I probably wouldn't have chosen those words. However, I am reasonably certain that the consensus Reformed view is that baptism carries no salvific effects. I suspect there is an easy explanation for the language of the WCF, and I'm just not seeing it right now.
And if it is not in any way salvific, then *why* do it?
We baptize because it is commanded by God. It is a public obedience to Him. Covenant baptism has additional benefits.
As Flannery O'Connor once said, "Well, if it's a symbol, to hell with it."
Now you have to admit that's the epitome of irony coming from a Catholic! :)
Either the "benefits" contribute to salvation or not. If not, then why do them? And if you say, Because God commands, then why would God command you do to do something that did not contribute to your salvation?
Now you have to admit that's the epitome of irony coming from a Catholic!
I would have said the same as a Protestant. But now I realize that we don't have mere symbols. We have things that are truly holy.
-A8