Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wordsofearnest
Thank you for the verses from James. Here's a good discussion on James vs. Paul by Arthur Pink...

JUSTIFICATION: ITS EVIDENCE

"In Romans 3:28 the Apostle Paul declared "that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law," and then produces the case of Abraham to prove his assertion. But the Apostle James, from the case of the same Abraham, draws quite another conclusion, saying, "Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only" (James 2:24). This is one of the "contradictions in the Bible" to which infidels appeal in support of their unbelief. But the Christian, however difficult he finds it to harmonize passages apparently opposite, knows there cannot be any contradiction in the Word of God. Faith has unshaken confidence in the inerrancy of Holy Writ. Faith is humble too and prays, "That which I see not teach Thou me" (Job. 34:32). Nor is faith lazy; it prompts its possessor unto a reverent examination and diligent investigation of that which puzzles and perplexes, seeking to discover the subject of each separate book, the scope of each writer, the connections of each passage.

Now the design of the Apostle Paul in Romans 3:28 may be clearly perceived from its context. He is treating of the great matter of a sinner’s justification before God: he shows that it cannot be by works of the law, because by the law all men are condemned, and also because if men were justified on the ground of their own doings, then boasting could not be excluded. Positively he affirms that justification is by grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. His reasoning will appear the more conclusive if the whole passage (Rom. 3:19-28) be read attentively. Because the Jews had a high regard of Abraham, the Apostle proceeded to show in the 4th chapter of Romans that Abraham was justified in that very way—apart from any works of his own, by faith alone. By such a method of justification the pride of the creature is strained, and the grace of God is magnified.

Now the scope of the Apostle James is very different: his Epistle was written to counteract quite another error. Fallen men are creatures of extremes: no sooner are they driven out of the false refuge of trusting to their own righteousness, than they fly to the opposite and no less dangerous error of supposing that, since they cannot be justified by their own works, that there is no necessity whatever for good works, and no danger from ungodly living and unholy practice. It is very clear from the New Testament itself that very soon after the Gospel was freely proclaimed, there arose many who turned the grace of God into "lasciviousness": that this was not only quickly espoused in theory, but soon had free course in practice. It was therefore the chief design of the Apostle James to show the great wickedness and awful danger of unholy practice and to assert the imperative necessity of good works..."

Here's Pink's entire book online...

THE DOCTRINE OF JUSTIFICATION

Happy Thanksgiving.

488 posted on 11/22/2006 2:42:10 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
Thank you very much for the excerpt from Arthur Pink & the link to his book. Very helpful (!!) & makes perfect sense, since James is probably the earliest written book of the New Testament and James, not being an extensive traveler like Paul, would have been writing primarily to early Jewish converts to the Christian faith near Jerusalem (I imagine) who might well have jumped to a mis-conclusion about their new-found freedom from the Old Testament 'law' & 'works' of worship, much like lottery winners no longer bound to the daily grind of a mundane job.

It may well have appeared to those early Christians that no more requirement for 'works' or adherence to 'laws' meant granting of a license to fully explore sin without fear of a wrathful God (which Paul also controverts many years later, in his Epistles, but more briefly). But James, writing for Jerusalem's new Christians, may have felt a more urgent need to counter an initial, fast-spreading misinterpretation.

Anyway, thanks again & have a Happy Thanksgiving!

502 posted on 11/22/2006 6:05:23 PM PST by O Neill (Aye, Katie Scarlett, the ONLY thing that lasts is the land...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson