Skip to comments.I've Got Something In My Eye [Griswold, TEC]
Posted on 10/30/2006 6:02:36 PM PST by sionnsar
Well, Frank, it's getting on toward that time, isn't it? I knew this day was coming, I just didn't think it would get here so...or be so...you know. Anyway, Frank Griswold was in London recently and preached a sermon at St. Johns Anglican Church in Notting Hill:
My reason for being here in London has been to introduce Bishop Katharine to his Grace, the Archbishop of Canterbury. While I have known Archbishop Rowan for many years our friendship dating back to his days as a professor at Oxford my successor had yet to meet him. It was an immensely positive and fruitful exchange.
Meaning that Dr. Williams was cordial and didn't show us both the door, figuring the Global South primates would take care of that little unpleasantry for him next February.
The Anglican Communion, through its international consultative council, has committed itself to gender equity in all of its representative and consultative bodies. The election of Bishop Katharine to serve as 26th Presiding Bishop, and therefore Primate, is a first step toward bringing gender balance to what until now has been an all male preserve.
As well as a poke in the eye to everyone who thinks that primates ought to be elected because of their merits rather than their sex.
There are those who have indicated that they will not sit at the same table with her. I do hope that once they meet her as a person, rather than as a fabrication of the Internet, they will be able to sense the depth and authenticity of her faith, and to recognize her as a sister in Christ and a fellow bishop.
"A fabrication of the Internet," Frank? So we should ignore everything Kate's said, written and done in her ludicrously brief career as a bishop and "meet her as a person?" The trouble is that if we "meet her as a person," she's liable to say things which will get reported on the Internet so I guess we'll have to ignore those as well. So I really don't see what we're supposed to judge Kate on other than that she's a woman and "a first step toward bringing gender balance to what until now has been an all male preserve."
It is ironic that though women represent the majority of the Anglican Communion, their voices and their reconciling views are woefully underrepresented. In so many situations of conflict and division throughout the world it is women who, because of their passion for life and the wellbeing of the family, are the peacemakers. It is women who courageously refuse to play the largely male power games of who is in and who is out, who is strong, who is weak. These invidious games afflict not only nations but the church as well.
Thank you, Phil Donahue. But two words, Frank. Margaret Thatcher. Anyway, let's get into Frank's actual sermon. Not that you haven't read it a dozen times before.
Todays gospel reading presents us with blind Bartimaeus who encounters Jesus making his way through the town of Jericho. If today you visit Jericho you will be shown an ancient tree in the center of town, and told confidently that it is the very tree under which blind Bartimaeus sat on that fateful day.
There is, however, another way to approach todays gospel. While it is clearly an account of Jesus healing a blind man, it can also serve as an invitation to explore blindness as a spiritual condition in which we see but do not see. Here I am put in mind of John Cosins paraphrase of Veni Creator, the hymn sung at ordinations in which we pray to God the Holy Spirit "enable with perpetual light, the dullness of our blinded sight."
How easy it is for us personally, ecclesially and nationally to live with blinded sight. Unquestioningly and uncritically we accept prevailing attitudes, opinions and biases as self-evident, as true. The dullness of the familiar can so easily keep us from seeing the inequities, the untruths, the injustices that surround us.
Such as? Frank's in London preaching to however many Anglicans showed up. What do you think?
In my own country the naïve belief on the part of many that the United States can only do good in the world meant that many of us who spoke against the impending invasion of Iraq were labeled unpatriotic. Now, as this unconscionable war drags on and on costing thousands of lives due to deception and a presidents blind insistence on the rightness of his course the eyes of many have been opened. Now, a season of sober self-examination has begun. But, alas, how quickly we forget what we have learned. How easily we revert once again to blinded sight. How eagerly we wrap ourselves again in the security of old chauvinisms and certitudes and the dark comfort they afford.
If you've read him for any length of time, you know what Frank is awfully good at sucking up to foreign audiences. He did it in Cuba and he's doing it here. So he has to ignore the fact that the Iraq war was started because the intelligence the President received indicated that Iraq had WMD's, a fact which was believed by his predecessor, Bill Clinton, and just about everybody else in Washington who's running for cover now. But Frank is after much larger game.
Nowhere is this danger more present than in the life of the church with its built in bias toward the past and the continuum of tradition regarded as fixed and immutable. Of course, tradition itself is made up of a series of provocative inbreakings of divine outrageousness focused for us as Christians in the scandal of the Incarnation: Gods pitching his tent and dwelling among us as one of us in the person of Jesus, paradoxically both fully human and fully divine as the Council of Chalcedon declared in 451.
A typical Griswoldian theme. The spirit doing a new thing, etc. And since it's Frank speaking, you know he's going to beat the point to death.
It was that same Jesus who said to his disciples "I still have many more things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth He will take what is mine and declare it to you." The historical Jesus has ascended as the risen Christ to the Father and is no longer with us.
Hmmm. Apparently, Frank's Jesus isn't with him always, even unto the end of the age. Explains a lot, actually.
Therefore, wristbands which you see from time to time in the United States bearing the letters WWJD What Would Jesus Do are irrelevant. The proper question is: what is the risen Christ up to right now through the agency of the Holy Spirit unsettling, prodding, challenging, stretching, illumining and sometimes causing havoc?
As well as okaying the election of homosexual bishops so shut up about Gene Robinson.
To be delivered from blinded sight involves a cost. For Bartimaeus to cry out after Jesus involved a risk. The safety provided by his status in the community as the blind beggar under a tree was cast off, along with his cloak, as he rose up over the objections of the townspeople who saw him only as a familiar passive and dependant fixture within their limited landscape. They were not prepared for his transformation and liberation at the hands of Jesus. Nor were they prepared for a change in their perceptions. Neither, quite frankly, are we. Nor is the church, as Christ animates his risen body and us its members with his death-defying life which makes all things now. This is not a newness are always ready to receive, but a newness that is being worked among us by the Spirit.
Told you. But let's rip the United States some more.
"Me racist? What do you mean?" This is the offended outcry sometimes heard in the United States, which, in spite of advances in the area of civil rights, is still profoundly racist. And here I am obliged to acknowledge the historical complicity and studied unawareness on the part of the Episcopal Church, which we in recent days have publicly acknowledged and are seeking, with the help of the Spirit of truth, to overcome. The pain of that acknowledgement, particularly in the North which is having to own its long overlooked participation in, and economic benefit from, the slave trade is difficult to bear because it calls into question much of the presumed virtue of our forebears.
Typical. The Episcopal Church is American. There was slavery in America in the early 1800's. QED, the Episcopal Church probably had something to do with the slave trade. Hell, it probably had its own fleet of slavers. But it is nice of Frank to acknowledge that not all the evil in the antebellum United States was found south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
Two days ago I presided at the Eucharist in Christ Church, Philadelphia standing over the tomb of Bishop William White, the first Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, whose own views on the subject of slavery or the status of his domestic staff are in dispute. It is always easy with hindsight to see what those before us should have seen and been able to acknowledge. Rather than condemn them for their blinded sight we should ask ourselves what is it that I am afraid to see or to acknowledge? We ask this recognizing that if we did see clearly, the status quo would be threatened or undermined.
And nobody anywhere would get bent out of shape about practicing homosexuals with pointy hats.
What are the many more things the risen Christ who is himself the Truth seeking to reveal to us through the workings and motions, the proddings and promptings of the Spirit of truth? How do we distinguish the authentic manifestations of the Spirit from those that are false? Are we able to recognize the fact that the Spirit of truth is not confined to the church and is involved with things secular? The changing role of women in society, and more particularly as they ever more assume positions of leadership, leads quite naturally to the same changes in the church. At times the secular challenges the sacred and becomes the means by which the Spirit of truth stretches and expands the churchs consciousness.
We get it, Frank.
In the Acts of the Apostles, which is an account of what happens when the Spirit of the risen Christ is unleashed in the world, we find the apostolic church challenged in its Jewishness by the Spirit who ignores the boundaries established by the law and descends upon the Gentiles those outside the law and therefore outside the community of faith. The church had to struggle, therefore, with the provocative and unsettling fact of the Spirits presence in the lives of those heretofore considered unredeemed. The church, faced with this new reality, found itself challenged and obliged not without struggle and debate to modify the law, and therefore its self understanding, in order to make way for those whom the law would exclude.
The result was not simply a compromise, but a new way of seeing: the marginalized and excluded and unclean were now regarded as brothers and sisters held fast within the arms of Christs saving embrace. Is it not possible that the Spirit of truth is profoundly present in our own day in the struggles and tensions we are experiencing in the life of the Anglican Communion?
Since Frank's never read it, here's what the Scripture Frank's referring to actually says:
With them they sent the following letter: The apostles and elders, your brothers, To the Gentile believers in Antioch, Syria and Cilicia: Greetings. We have heard that some went out from us without our authorization and disturbed you, troubling your minds by what they said. So we all agreed to choose some men and send them to you with our dear friends Barnabas and Paul men who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore we are sending Judas and Silas to confirm by word of mouth what we are writing. It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals AND FROM SEXUAL IMMORALITY. You will do well to avoid these things. Farewell(Acts 15:23-29).
Anyone who can extract practicing homosexual bishops from that is as deliberately dishonest as Frank is.
To be faithful to Scripture requires a willingness, indeed an eagerness, to follow the Spirit of truth wherever we may be led. However, to pray Come, Holy Ghost enable with perpetual light the dullness of our blinded sight is dangerous and involves risk the risk of being obliged to change our opinions, to cast away protective biases, to make room for the unfamiliar and sometimes unwelcome. This is what it means to bear the cost of unblinded sight. And yet, as painful as this may be, as our certitudes are challenged and purified by the Spirit of truth, there is worked within us an increasing ability to see as God sees and to love as Christ loves.
But not an ability to repent for making Robbie a bishop. Our spirit can't change its mind about that. Laws of the Medes and the Persians, doncha know.
Christianity says that at the center of the universe is the love of the Father for the Son and the love of the Son for the Father. Electing a woman as bishop denies the essence of Christianity. Whatever religion the Episcopal Church is currently practicing, it isn't Christianity.
Episcopalians didn't have the courage to see through the heresy trial of Bishop Pike back in the '60s. They were afraid the press would ridicule them for something as preposterous as heresy. That was a fatal error.
The Episcopal church is today a party of multiculturalism, gender equality and identity politics. But it isn't Christianity. I remains to be seen if the Church of England follows the same path.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.