Replies

Hey Guys! If I do Adiaireton8's work for him and complete his Part II]Evidence from the Writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers for that great ecumenical treatise below, will you let him out of his purgatorial dungeon? I changed the numbers "1 and 2" to Roman numerals "I and II". I thought it would go over better with the magisterium there.

Are there any other changes that I should make on our treatise thus far, and if so, please provide the citations so as to include them. If I have left out anything that can be remotely construed by the most rhetorical amongst as evidence, I will post it and I hope you will as well.

I will be down at the monastery later today in their inquisitional library where they torture all those writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers to get them to cough up everything they said and even lot of things that they didn't say. We will use every inquisitional device to find all that we need to complete Part II of the treatise.

As you can see, we tortured the writings of Clement of Rome and Justin Martur, but we could not break them. They would not tell us what we wanted to hear. Pray that we are more successful with the latter.

We are doing this for poor Adiaireton8 to spring him from his purgatorial dungeon. Please don't be mean to him, he tried. But where he failed, Uncle Chip will prevail on his behalf. Please help me.

Hang in there, Adiaireton8. Help is on the way. Keep the faith. And I hope they let you read this.

THE EVIDENCE for THE TWENTY-FIVE YEAR BISHOPRIC of SAINT PETER in ROME and His UPSIDEDOWN CRUCIFIXION under NERO

Part I] Evidence From the Holy Scriptures: There is no evidence at all.

Part II] Evidence From the Writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers: (a work in progress by Uncle Chip on Adiaireton8's behalf)

A. Clement of Rome --- No Evidence

B. Justin Martur --- No Evidence

C. Ignatius of Antioch --- (pending)

D. Irenaeus of Lyons --- (questionable)

E. Dionysius at Corinth --- (pending)

F. Tertullian --- (pending)

G. Hippolytus --- (pending)

We have examined the copy of the Writings of Ignatius all afternoon at the monastery, and we think that we got everything out of it that it knows about Peter in Rome. It was quite forthcoming and confessed all it knew. The words are posted below.

There are other copies at the university. We will now examine those as well to see if they will tell us any more.

I trust that this will be acceptable as evidence in our treatise, though it doesn't say that the commandments Peter and Paul gave were to the Romans. But perhaps in the hands of your rhetorical wizards they can be tortured to confess and tell you what you want them to say.

I trust you are well Adiaireton8. Keep the faith. I hope they let you read this.

THE EVIDENCE for THE TWENTY-FIVE YEAR BISHOPRIC of SAINT PETER in ROME and His UPSIDEDOWN CRUCIFIXION under NERO

Part I] Evidence From the Holy Scriptures: There is no evidence at all.

Part II] Evidence From the Writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers: (a work in progress by Uncle Chip on Adiaireton8's behalf)

A. Clement of Rome [1st Century] --- No Evidence

B. Justin Martur of Rome [100-165 AD] --- No Evidence

C. Ignatius of Antioch [35-110 AD] --- (still under examination)

"I do not, as Peter and Paul, issue commandments to you. They were Apostles" [Epistle to the Romans 110 AD]

D. Irenaeus of Lyons [130-200 AD] --- (questionable)

E. Dionysius at Corinth [2nd Century]--- (pending)

F. Tertullian of Carthage [160-230 AD]--- (pending)

G. Hippolytus of Rome [170-236 AD] --- (pending)