So do I, but not having to do with a church. Whenever two or more are gathered. . . Of individual election, a church not being necessary, or the two or more being the generic church.
No question, the Church has always taught that faith is intensely personal, as it culminates in Penance and the Eucharist, both acts demanding an individual movement of soul.
When you have personal faith, a personal communion with God and the power of prayer, you do not need a church, except to commune with others of faith.
A church, such as the RCC, sets itself as a central authority, determining the worthiness of souls to Christ, the rituals necessary to the practice of faith and investment of oneself in the church to insure salvation.
The fact that God adds all things to those who seek first the kingdom makes a church, as a regulating entity, superfluous, because the seeking, finding and the reward are personal and individual things.
No one person in a church who finds the spirit insure the salvation of any other in the church, but the church can be leavened by strange and rootless doctrine and damage individual election unless one separate himself from it.
The only central authority of Christian faith and salvation must be Christ Himself and His Gospels, readable and understandable and the Spirit inside callable by any human being on the face of the Earth at his election and decision.
Any church must and can be only a gossamer net thrown over the whole of like minded individuals seeking to call the Christ by gathering in His name, and investing no authority on the net itself, which can itself receive no inspiration, spirit or salvation.
It's nice to belong to a church, but I don't think it necessary, or perhaps wise in some cases, artificial entities being especially vulnerable to corruption through leavening of only a few.
In my mind, the Body of Christ are spread throughout the world, members, many, of groups that meet together and worship, and many not, but no less saved.