Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg
Do we have anyone from around the time of those two saying Peter never went to Rome?

We have a direct command from the Lord to not go among the Gentiles. [Matthew 10:5-6]

Does this qualify?????

628 posted on 11/05/2006 12:06:44 PM PST by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Diego1618
We have a direct command from the Lord to not go among the Gentiles.[Matthew 10:5-6]
Does this qualify?????

I don't think it does. That command was given in a particular pre-death, pre-resurrection, pre-pentecost missionary situation. (In another place Jesus describes Himself as sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.) The ministry to the Gentiles is a post-pentecost deal.

It's interesting to try to make that pre missionary journey instruction stay in force after Pentecost, but then we'd have to re-think Paul's missionary journey.

That reminds me: there were Jews in Rome, so even if the command DID apply, Peter's going to Rome would not necesarily be a violation of it, right?

Anyway, we're let with some evidence that Peter went to Rome and no evidence (so far) that he didn't. The preponderance, therefore, is that he did.

631 posted on 11/05/2006 12:57:22 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson