Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Iscool
Nope...I'm saying Peter wasn't there...And the bible hints at that as well...

The verse you cited does no such thing. Just because Paul or some other Apostle went to Rome does not logically mean that Peter didn't.

If I write, "CTID posts on FreeRepublic" does that somehow mean that Iscool doesn't?
53 posted on 10/28/2006 7:55:38 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative til I die
The verse you cited does no such thing. Just because Paul or some other Apostle went to Rome does not logically mean that Peter didn't.

If the 'pope' was in Rome, wouldn't the chief Jews already have heard of Peter, and been preached the Kingdom of God??? Of course they would...

But the chiefs of the Jews knew nothing about the Kingdom of God other than the small talk and rumors they heard about another sect of religious nuts...And since the Jewish people were Peter's responsibility, that's a pretty good indication Peter was no where near the area...

99 posted on 10/28/2006 1:15:53 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson