Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD

No, Peter did not "rule" the Church from Rome. What he and Paul did was to lend their authority to the see of Rome, especially since each man was martyred there. As a result the capital city of the empire became the main focal point of the Church, especially after the destruction of Jerusalem.


29 posted on 10/28/2006 12:14:47 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
No, Peter did not "rule" the Church from Rome. What he and Paul did was to lend their authority to the see of Rome, especially since each man was martyred there.

Well, shucks. I thought Peter was the see of Rome.

45 posted on 10/28/2006 6:21:30 AM PDT by HarleyD ("Then He opened their minds to understand the Scriptures" Luk 24:45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS

"What he and Paul did was to lend their authority to the see of Rome, especially since each man was martyred there. As a result the capital city of the empire became the main focal point of the Church, especially after the destruction of Jerusalem."
_____________________________

What proof is there that Peter was martyred upside down in Rome. We know Paul was because of the books he wrote.

I think your second point is much more on target about why Rome emerged as the dominant power within the early church. They were located where the money and power of the state was.


59 posted on 10/28/2006 8:05:53 AM PDT by wmfights (Psalm : 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson