Replies

It's difficult to know how to respond to utter nonsense.

It is an argument, and there are only ways to refute an argument: show one of the premises to be false or show that conclusion does not follow from the premises. So here is the argument laid out in syllogistic form:

(1) Quix has the same authority as the Apostles,

(2) We do not need to obey Quix.

Therefore:

(3) We do not need to obey the Apostles. [from (1) & (2)]

(4) The NT is the writing of the Apostles

Therefore:

(5) We do not need to obey the NT: [from (3) and (4)]

- A8

1,536 posted on 10/26/2006 7:36:54 AM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)

I'm not sure if the tidy little box has shrunk or the . . . have bound up.

But I doubt I'll research it out very far.

1,537 posted on 10/26/2006 7:38:52 AM PDT by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794