To: Mrs. Don-o
Why would they live without sex?
Sex really isn't the issue. It's all the stuff that comes with sex - wife, kids, mortgage, teenagers, etc.
Once married, it would be ridiculous to live as brother and sister, imo, if they have all the other trappings of marriage. I really don't think that God intends for any man in his situation to throw his wife under the bus. :( The church let him enter as a married man - he needs to stay married.
To: Texas_shutterbug; kalee; kawaii
There is certainly precedent in the Faith of a husband and wife renouncing sexual relations by mutual consent. It's nothing I could recommend as a routine practice. And how that plays out depends on whether you;'re in your 30's, 40's, 60's, or 80's --- and also whether you're living with your spouse, or have separated by mutual consent to live a conventual or monastic life.
Having looked up his bio, I see that Fr. Ryland was ordained an Episcopal priest in 1950. I assume that means he was born before 1930, which would make him 80-ish now. Maybe neither sex, kids, mortgage, teenagers, etc. are relevant complications at this point... ;o)
19 posted on
10/16/2006 9:42:30 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(What does the LORD require of you: to do justly, to love tenderly, and to walk humbly with your God)
To: Texas_shutterbug
In the Old Testaament times, priests had to live apart from their wives while they served once a year in the Tmeple offering Sacrifice. THat was temporary continence.
As the New Testament Priest daily offers the Sacrifice of the New Covenant, it was a natural that Apostolic tradition would embrace permanent continency
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson