Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC; kerryusama04; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; jude24; Diego1618
No, it would be "Saturday night" according to our reckoning.

But not the sabbath/ That ended at sundown. It was "the frst day of the week."

The fact remains that, in this account, where the church -- baptized Jews and gentiles together -- is found worshipping, there is no mantion of any activity on the Jewish last day sabbath. Nothing. Nada. Zero. The same is true for the rest of the Scriptures. No last day sabbath worship for the universal church anywhere.

233 posted on 10/15/2006 6:59:11 PM PDT by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54; Diego1618; kerryusama04
No, it would be "Saturday night" according to our reckoning.But not the sabbath/ That ended at sundown. It was "the frst day of the week.

The "first of the sabbaths". Marking time by denoting WHEN the sabbath actually began and ended. Thus showing that the author BELIEVED the sabbath was still in effect.

The fact remains that, in this account, where the church -- baptized Jews and gentiles together -- is found worshipping, there is no mantion of any activity on the Jewish last day sabbath. Nothing. Nada. Zero. The same is true for the rest of the Scriptures. No last day sabbath worship for the universal church anywhere.

No wine. No ceremony. No mention of Lord's supper, but just breaking bread. Do you think that everytime "breaking bread" is mentioned in the bible that it's the Lord's Supper? Because it's mentioned alot.

236 posted on 10/15/2006 7:03:36 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson