Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Diego1618; topcat54; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; ladyinred
On one level, yes the Lord provided water for them to drink and I suppose they could have bathed with it, but still, it has nothing to do with baptism. The root word for streams suggests water flowing like the Nile, and therefore it suggests prosperity, all that they needed. On a higher level, this rock represents the Lord, from whom rivers flow, and we don't suppose anything other than living water flows from Him. And the rock that was struck, by the way, was flint, which has an even higher level of meaning.
391 posted on 09/28/2006 3:53:37 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (why is it so difficult to understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: 1000 silverlings
On one level, yes the Lord provided water for them to drink and I suppose they could have bathed with it, but still, it has nothing to do with baptism.

My friend......do you really think these folks may not have bathed for forty years?

395 posted on 09/28/2006 4:47:24 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson