To: King Prout
Hence the additional descriptor, evidentiary. If something is taken on faith to be true, regardless of any and all contrary evidence, why do those of this faith have a need to attempt to try to find supporting evidence and discount contrary evidence? I don’t get it.
853 posted on
09/21/2006 2:34:50 PM PDT by
ml1954
(ID = Case closed....no further inquiry allowed...now move along.)
To: ml1954
ah. thank you for clarifying.
yes, that is a puzzlement.
854 posted on
09/21/2006 2:36:53 PM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: ml1954
I also do not undertand this as well...to me, the very essence of having 'faith', is that it requires absolutely no evidence of any sort...if one needs evidence, then to me, it simply is not faith...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson