[RunningWolf]

Well this article is political propaganda and though it comes from a science magazine had nothing to do with empirical science

1. Evolution fits well with good theology.
2. Creationism is bad theology.
3. Evolution explains original sin and the Christian model of human nature.
4. Evolution explains family values.
5. Evolution accounts for specific Christian moral precepts.
6. Evolution explains conservative free-market economics.

[King Prout]

the characteristics of the article which you decry do not validate a strawman understanding of the essentials of empirical science.

to imply otherwise, as you appeared to do just now, is a logical fallacy called "non-sequitur"

if you did not intend such an implication, then your post appears void of both purpose AND relevance.

[presently no screen name]

Propaganda indeed. It shows the NEED to sell their philosophy. Just like the libs and their taking points - they are good and have the answers and the conservatives are bad. SAME MINDSET!! It's no wonder the evo's flock to FR, there is no one to argue with at DU.

1. Evolution fits well
2. Creationism is bad
3. Evolution explains
4. Evolution explains
5. Evolution accounts
6. Evolution explains