[unspun]

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory. Also, to point out how human beings (and animals) have abilities that are simply not addressable by the vain materialist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism.

Prove that, and you could be the next nobel prize winner. The problem is that the whole statement is nonsense, and you would be laughed out of any scientific conference.

Once again, the "burden of proof" is with those who would propound the "theory," not with those who point out the standards which are not being met. Once again, I leave dealings with documentation that is not science but is presented as science (i.e., pseudo-science) to "you" (i.e., the Darwinist). And as I leave, I bid you newfound intellectual peace.

[Dimensio]

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory.

You have been provided with examples of tests for the theory of evolution. That you refuse to accept that they are actually a part of the theory does not negate their existence.

[Liberal Classic]

You're incorrect. Evolutionary theory is currently the dominant model. As it is the status quo, the burden of proof is on those who argue to the contrary.