Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

"The rate of mutation and genetic change is relatively constant."

And we know this because what?

Observation or supposition.

What is our time baseline?


329 posted on 09/19/2006 1:33:14 PM PDT by srweaver (Never Forget the Judicial Homicide of Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: srweaver
"The rate of mutation and genetic change is relatively constant." And we know this because what? Observation or supposition. What is our time baseline?

We can calibrate it historically with other observations such as rates of erosion, rates of rock formation, radiometric dating, tree-rings, varve counting. All of these techniques give remarkably consistent results. If our uniformitarian assumption is wrong, then why do lots of different techniques that rely on uniformitarianism give the same results?

340 posted on 09/19/2006 1:54:59 PM PDT by Thatcherite (I'm PatHenry I'm the real PatHenry all the other PatHenrys are just imitators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

To: srweaver

Observation.


354 posted on 09/19/2006 3:21:04 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson