Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
My reponse to your quote from 1537 is not the excerpt shown with that excerpt on your post 1603, but rather post 1558
1,700 posted on 09/28/2006 9:07:19 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
My response to your quote from 1537 is not the excerpt shown with that excerpt on your post 1603, but rather post 1558

I authorize you to pretend it doesn't matter where I said it. I have said essentially the same thing several time in slightly different words. I just picked what I think is the best expression of my thoughts.

1,705 posted on 09/28/2006 9:51:56 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1700 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl
PatrickHenry at 1539: it's not a demonstrated fact, and it's not a pillar of Darwin's theory, that all life (including the first life) must come from pre-existing life.

js1138 at 1570 common descent is just the current best interpretation of evidence. It is unrelated to biogenesis or to the dynamics of evolution.

I'm willing to start over on this point, if you are willing to tell me what the point is.

1,722 posted on 09/28/2006 11:16:00 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1700 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson