To: Coyoteman
OOOh, a bunch of pretty pictures which mean exactly jack. Where in all those skulls is the proof of your theory?
1,326 posted on
09/23/2006 8:51:45 PM PDT by
SoldierDad
(Proud Father of an American Soldier)
To: SoldierDad
OOOh, a bunch of pretty pictures which mean exactly jack. Where in all those skulls is the proof of your theory? With all this handwaving, have you reached V1 yet?
You really should just admit it: no amount of evidence will be convincing because your mind is made up.
With that, good night to you.
1,327 posted on
09/23/2006 9:03:02 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: SoldierDad
The Rise and Fall of Skull KNM-ER 1470, a transitory into some mens fancy.
The Rise and Fall of Skull KNM-ER 1470
In late 1972, an enigmatic fossilized skull was unearthed near Lake Turkana, Kenya. The skull, which was subsequently accessioned as East Rudolf specimen 1470 (or KNMER 1470 in abbreviated form), was unearthed by Bernard Ngeneo a field worker for renowned paleoanthropologist, Richard E. Leakey.
original reconstruction of Skull KNMER 1470
The discovery was greeted with much enthusiasm by evolutionists the world over because it appeared to bridge the gap between the putative hominid line of ancestors (including the australopithecines and Homo habilis) and the decidedly more humanlike fossils designated Homo erectus
Leakey himself ended up back pedaling on this one..,
profile of 1470.
Based on new bone-scanning techniques, typical australopithecine prognathicity is evident in this 1992 drawing
There is precious little evidence to show otherwise. For the present it should be quietly packed away and added to the long list of abandoned or downgraded hominid specimens, which once adorned our natural history textbooks.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson