you added your own words, without notice that you had done so...
you combined definition 1c1 and 6, without notice that you had done so...
you completely ignored the one definition set (#5) which had anything to do with evolution as applied to living organisms, without notice that you had done so...
each of the above observations is factual, demonstrable and repeatable by independent observers.
Taken together, the observed actions render your post other than word-for-word transcription of what you claimed to be quoting (which makes your claim of quotation a misrepresentation in itself), and sufficiently alter the meaning of the "definition" to render it false.
and now you claim your post was "word for word" and that you "didn't misrepresent or lie"
Well, I have been directed to avoid calling a FReeper a liar.
I am fairly sure I am allowed to point out that your own words and actions save me that trouble.
It is not difficult to understand the guideline of "don't make it personal."
Any further non-compliance on this thread will result in suspensions.
Warrior of Justice: you are a newcomer. Be advised that intentional misrepresentations on the Religion Forum usually result in banishment. You get this one and only pass because you are a newbie. The next time you present selective excerpts on the Religion Forum, use on-line sources, provide links to your sources and make your editorial comments clear so they cannot be confused with content at the source.