Posted on 09/11/2006 7:06:05 PM PDT by sionnsar
Bishop Lipscomb and the American Way Alice C. Linsley
Bishop Lipscomb has encouraged members of his diocese to refrain from participation in a significant public forum: the religious blog. The Bishop should know better than to try to curtail the American love of debate. Blogs serve the church much as the colonial tracts served the American Revolution. Some writings on the blogs have been as influential as the Federalist Papers in shaping opinions and some comments have been as inflammatory as the most provocative revolutionary propaganda.
The public debate in colonial America acted as pitocin to the birth of our nation. It was aided by faster printing presses. Today the Anglican blogs are aiding birth of a different revolution. Almost hourly the headlines change at Titusonenine, StandFirm, and Drell’s Descants. Here readers find news, comments, information and personal reflections that help them to gain perspective on The Episcopal Church and the greater Anglican Communion. Similarly, the colonial tracts made it possible for people to scrutinize King George’s policies and decrees in a new light. As Greg Griffith wrote, “It’s no secret that many bishops - orthodox as well as revisionist - rue the day the blog was invented, mainly because it takes away so much of their control of the information about this debate.”
Bishop Lipscomb should be concerned about controlling information. Information in the wrong hands can destroy an empire. Bishop Lipscomb clearly recognizes that the Episcopal diocese over which he has jurisdiction is inflamed and on the edge of revolution. Blogging only makes matters worse, especially for revisionists and for bishops in power, even orthodox bishops. The cyber debate has served as a call to arms and the fighting forces are now arranged on the field. The uniformed army of the Episcopal empire is well equipped while the militia looks rather ragged and forlorn, but if history has a truth to teach us, it is that those who fight for their homes fight hardest. Fighting for their homes, orthodox parishes across the country have gained ground in recent weeks and it appears that the battle may be turning.
This war of words may be bloodless, but it is not without fatalities. We mustn’t underestimate the heartache and losses that the conflict has inflicted. The Episcopal Church has lost thousands of members and millions of dollars in annual income and property. It has also lost some of its most talented clergy. Utterly failing to construct a convincing document in support of its new religion, ECUSA has also lost its former image as a thinking person’s church. The blogs have recorded these developments day by day and the information is available to anyone who has access to a computer. No wonder the leaders of the Episcopal Church want people to “fast” from blogging.
Is an end to the blogging wars in sight? An Anglican version of the continental congress and a TEC-Canterbury version of parliament will meet this month and this signals a widespread recognition that Anglicans have reached an impasse. It appears that the leaders finally realize the need for a negotiated settlement.
If Frank Griswold had been a strong moral leader such as General George Washington, a faithful Anglican Christian, perhaps this war could have been avoided. When Washington heard that some men at Valley Forge were taking God’s name in vain he issued an order to his officers that they were to set a godly example and that “both they and the men will reflect that we can have little hope of the blessing from Heaven upon our arms if we continue to insult It by our impiety and folly.”
Unfortunately Frank Griswold has been more like King George, lacking in diplomacy and refusing to accept the wind’s direction. King George’s arrogance and denial of reality so frustrated colonists in their attempts to receive a just and fair hearing that they finally reached a breaking point. This is where The Episcopal Church and Anglicans are today: at a breaking point.
True to our American history there doubtless will be a replication of what we had before the church revolution. Anglican identity in the U.S.A. will take a course consistent with its DNA, spelled out in these words from the first American Book of Common Prayer (1789): “But when in the course of Divine Providence, these American States became independent with respect to civil government, their ecclesiastical independence was necessarily included.” American Anglicans made the break once and they can, and probably will, do it again.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.