Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kstewskis

"According to Rome (and VatII) it has never been "prohibited"."

Why, then, was an indult required?


17 posted on 09/11/2006 3:40:47 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: dsc

Novus Ordum => Novus Ordo.

Duh. I was thinking "novus ordure" while I was typing.


18 posted on 09/11/2006 3:43:19 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: dsc
"According to Rome (and VatII) it has never been "prohibited"."

Why, then, was an indult required?

Because it was left up to the individual diocesan bishops to "grant" the annulments. It's the bishops call. Even though Rome never prohibited them, many US bishops refused to grant the indult.

20 posted on 09/11/2006 4:12:01 PM PDT by kstewskis ("Tolerance is what happens when one loses their principles..." Fr. A. Saenz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson