No, I wouldn't change my advice to Harley. His comment above indicated a total rejection of the idea. And you were far from that. You conceded that the 90's AD position was an acceptable one.
That's all I conceded, depending on what you mean by "acceptable". It's not acceptablet to me personally. I do not find "considerable evidence" for the AD90s date. Based on fallible information and insight I find the AD90s date as inferior and the AD60s date as superior.
That does not mean I would burn you at the stake for holding to the AD90s view (which seems to be what some of you folks have in mind for the AD60s crowd). So in that sense it is an acceptable one.