Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: BibChr

My major concern is the blurring the distinction between national Israel and the Church. I am convinced that the bible teaches a role for national Israel.

If this were simply a dispute over "how many" dispensations there are, and these folks are in favor of 2 basic covenants in this era (Old Covenant/New Covenant), one called the millennium, and then one called the "new heaven and new earth," then I'm not going to think there's any real concern here.

But the national Israel issue is the major consideration.


9 posted on 08/25/2006 6:57:11 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Oh yeah, among any who know anything about it, the number of dispensations has never been the big deal. That's why the label isn't the best; it focuses on what really isn't the distinguishing factor of the system.


10 posted on 08/25/2006 7:01:35 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
"But the national Israel issue is the major consideration."
________________________________

Eschatology is not a strong point for me. As I understand it Historic Premillennialism defers from Dispensational Premillennialism in that HP believes the rapture will occur after the 7yr trib. in all other ways they are similar. How does the nation of Israel play into this? I don't believe in replacement theology do either of these schools of thought?
15 posted on 08/25/2006 9:26:22 AM PDT by wmfights (Psalm : 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson