1 posted on
08/25/2006 6:09:29 AM PDT by
xzins
To: P-Marlowe; Buggman; blue-duncan; Alamo-Girl; Corin Stormhands; BibChr
I'm interested in other dispensationalist's viewpoints. Non-dispensationalists are certainly invited to offer FRIENDLY, non-disruptive observations. However, there is no desire here to get in a food fight with those having other millennial views (amil, postmil, preterist, etc.)
2 posted on
08/25/2006 6:13:09 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
To: xzins
Without reading any replies, I'll say:
A. I agree with the article, at least basically. And
B. It's really going to irritate the guilty consciences of devotees of the "shrug+'whatever'" approach to blurring 2/3 of the Bible.
Dan
6 posted on
08/25/2006 6:42:47 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: xzins
BTW, the joke around Talbot was:
Q: When is a dispensationalist not a dispensationalist?
A: When he's Bob Saucy.
7 posted on
08/25/2006 6:43:42 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: xzins
13 posted on
08/25/2006 7:43:30 AM PDT by
opus86
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson