[Celtman]

The fact is, I am obeying the Logical forms of Analogical Reasoning exactly -- I have changed none of the Terms of the Equation, only the Variables.

      Balderdash.  In terms of predicate calculus, neither "Israel" nor "The White Race" is a variable - they have been quantified.  (In other words, they are constants.)  Your argument is logically equivalent to:

• 7 > 23 is false.
• Therefore 35 > 11 is false.

      Clearly fallacious reasoning.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

The fact is, I am obeying the Logical forms of Analogical Reasoning exactly -- I have changed none of the Terms of the Equation, only the Variables. ~~ Balderdash. In terms of predicate calculus, neither "Israel" nor "The White Race" is a variable - they have been quantified. (In other words, they are constants.) Your argument is logically equivalent to: 7 > 23 is false. Therefore 35 > 11 is false. Clearly fallacious reasoning.

No. You have it all wrong. OF COURSE you can argue that "neither "Israel" nor "The White Race" is a variable - they have been quantified"...

...Though that contention itself is extremely debatable, hardly the mathematically Defined Set you so foolishly make it out to be (what defines "the White Race"? According to the Christian Identity folks, even 1 "mud-race" ancestor in 10 generations disaqualifies one from the "White Race. What defines "Ethnic Israel"? If A Half-Jew marries a Gentile in the Millenial Kingdom, are their children counted as Ethnic Jews, to be elevated to supremacy over all Non-Jews? What about an Octoroon-Jew? Or the children of an Octoroon-Jew?)

However, the point of the argument is NOT whether or not "Ethnic Jews" or "The White Race" can be mathematically quantified; the point is whether or not the following equation holds qualitatively true for either set:

Where [subset B] is segregated and elevated above the remainder of [Set A] (The non-elevated remainder of Set A being defined as [subset C]), the segregational elevation of Subset B over Subset C constitutes a segregation of Set A.

Ergo, Subset B and C are the Variables (Subset C being defined as all of Set A which is not Subset B), and it does not matter which Ethnic Group you plug into Subset B -- Jews, Whites, Blacks, whatever.

As long as Set A (Christians) are divided into "Elevated" Subset B (insert Ethnic Group here) and "Lower" Subset C (All "A"s which are not part of Subset B), the Theology in question is Racially Divisive and violates Galatians 3:28; i.e., the Theology in Question is AGAINST BIBLICAL LAW.

Best, OP