[P-Marlowe]

Yes, all I did, which apparently ired him, was to introduce into evidence, more of Romans 10.

Objection, non responsive. No question pending. Answer is argumentative.

Sustained.

BTW as a point of order, we are talking about the "Absolute Law" interpretation of Galatians 3:28. If we are going to argue ALL of Romans 10, we are going to need to start a new thread.

Carry on.

[1000 silverlings]

Seems to me the latest post was on whether or not Prince William is the next David, but whatever.