[jo kus]

I apologize if you took my remarks as snide. My intent was to show from Scripture that Sola Fide is not biblical. You have not proven me wrong. I understand your new manuever is a face-saving one. So be it. I would be happy to show you that other Catholic doctrines are NOT against Scriptures, unlike Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura. But I doubt you will give me that opportunity.

I will leave it to others who have read our exchanges to determine whether I have shown Sola Fide is NOT biblical. Your understanding of Scripture is based on the findings of men of today's culture and their own ideas, while mine is based on the Tradition passed down from 2000 years, so I suppose I have an advantage - access to the Truth given to the Apostles...

Good luck to you and God bless in your future endeavors.

Regards

[politicallyincarrect]

>>I will leave it to others who have read our exchanges to determine whether I have shown Sola Fide is NOT biblical.<<

We've both made our cases... I willing to let others decide for themselves as well...

>>Your understanding of Scripture is based on the findings of men of today's culture and their own ideas,<<

You don't have a clue how I've arrived at my "understanding of Scriptures"... So let me tell you... As I've said before... I have no axe to grind... I've looked at every view point, read numerous commentators, including RCC and compared them with Scripture... That is how I've come to my conclusions...

>> while mine is based on the Tradition passed down from 2000 years, <<

That is obvious... :-)

>>so I suppose I have an advantage - <<

Advantage? I think not considering the real source of your "traditions"...

>>access to the Truth given to the Apostles...<<

All truth is found in the Bible alone... Any man made interpretations of what the Apostles believed and practiced is invalid if it is not backed up by Scripture... Error is error no matter how many times it is believed, taught, or practiced...