[Wonder Warthog]

"There are so many fundamental differences between the Southern Baptists and the RCC that one would have to wonder which came first... Rejection of Biblical theology or acceptance of RCC doctrine... I would suspect the former rather than the latter..."

Actually, it is more likely that he converted because he ACCEPTED "Biblical theology". The Bible itself explicitly teaches (St. Paul) that it itself is NOT the sole inspired Word of God (i.e. that "sola Scriptura" IS NOT BIBLICAL). Add to that the fact that for four hundred years after the death of Christ, there WAS no Bible.

What was rejected was "Reformation theology".

[politicallyincarrect]

>>What was rejected was "Reformation theology".<<

The only "theology" that I'm interested in is Biblical theology... "Reformation theology" clearly has its problems... Do I believe that I've got it all down pat? Not at all, but I do recognize heresy when I see it and am able to refute it Biblically.