>>Before attacking the personal faith of Mr. Cumbie or any other Catholics .... <<
I appreciate the fact that you did not accuse me of attacking Mr. Cumbie personally... However, I do not apologize for "attacking" his beliefs or any others that hold to the same anti-Biblical theology that he does...
It doesn't matter what Mr. Cumbie's personal reasons were for joining the RCC... What he says he believes now is a matter of public record... And is fair game.. If the RCC want to push his "conversion" as a positive thing.. Then there shouldn't be any objection to another point of view.
On what grounds can you determine what is "anti-Biblical" aside from those that exist based on your own personal interpretation of the Bible? How can you say that your interpretation (which I would assume agrees with the interpretation of the pastor of your Church), is any better or worse than Mr. Cumbie's (which happens to agree with the Catholic Church)?
Feel free to continue to discuss, but I ask you for the sake of truth to listen to his testimony as well, even though you will probably disagree.
As for me, I'm going to sleep; it's past 1 a.m. here on the East Coast.