To: topcat54; Buggman; xzins; blue-duncan
You are missing the point tc. The point is that there is NO evidence that the book of revelation was written prior to 70AD. There is evidence that it was written around 96AD.
Your position is contingent upon a pre-70AD book of Revelation. Ours is not. You can denigrate the evidence we present all you want, but the fact is that you have no evidence at all.
285 posted on
08/09/2006 10:42:55 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
To: P-Marlowe; xzins; blue-duncan; HarleyD; TomSmedley; Alex Murphy; Lee N. Field; Buggman; ...
The point is that there is NO evidence that the book of revelation was written prior to 70AD. I'm sure your studied Ken Gentry's book, Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation or John AT Robinson's Redating the New Testament in order to stand behind your assertion. If not, why don't you give them a shot and then we can discuss the subject more intelligently.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson