Replies

The most probable scenario is that prophetic futurists will sit back and do nothing as they see Israel go up in smoke since the Bible predicts an inevitable holocaust.

Okay, can somebody tell me when exactly slandering and outright lying about one's Christian brothers was considered evidence of the Spirit?

You know, TC, it is the "Dispensationalists" who have consistantly supported Israel. It is the Presbyterians who have divested themselves of her. "Dispensationalists" want Israel to stand firm in the fact of attack; Replacement Theologists like DeMar want her to capitulate and thereby encourage more terrorism on innocent Jews.

The reason that Premills believe there will be another Holocaust is that we believe there will be a Holocaust against everyone who refuses to worship the final Man of Sin. That means that we expect the Jews to demonstrate their fidelity to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob with the same rigour as the Christians. We expect to be brothers.

With every article, you more and more prove that DeMar is too busy giving himself an uninstrumented colonoscopy to actually do his research and give reasoned answers to the actual beliefs of Premills instead of his strawmen.

Okay, can somebody tell me when exactly slandering and outright lying about one's Christian brothers was considered evidence of the Spirit?. . .
With every article, you more and more prove that DeMar is too busy giving himself an uninstrumented colonoscopy to actually do his research and give reasoned answers to the actual beliefs of Premills instead of his strawmen.

Think you might want to rephrase that, brother?

What I see, from where I sit, is a lot of dispensationalists who don't get the objection that others have to their "separation theology" (you-all want to coin a pejorative, I can too), and get awful touchy when criticized.

We've all (that are Christian) got the same Bible, we're all reading the same texts, we all hold it as authoritative. But we're coming to quite different conclusions.