Replies

Dear landerwy,

"Well I do not buy your logic and to be honest with you I believe that logic played a major role in Roe v wade being decided the way it is."

Maybe, but I doubt it. If the Court had wanted to carve out an area of law for raped women to get abortions, they could have used the logic you've presented. No, the whole thing was a set-up to "free" women from the consequences of sex.

Instead, they've been enslaved by their "liberation."

"God commanded the Isrealites to take innocent life; to spare none; destroy women and children."

Well, when you can show me a verifiable command of God to kill some innocent human beings, let me know. Until then, I believe that the law should always protect the fundamental liberties of human beings, including the right of innocent human beings not to be directly, intentionally murdered.

"Sperm changes but it message (DNA) does not. It is there and an invader. Unwanted and unsolicited."

Well, not quite. The message recombines with that of the ovum, to create a new, unique human being who is ontologically different from either her father or mother. The DNA of this new human being resembles that of both the sperm and the ovum, but is not identical to either.

And this new human being deserves the protection of law.

sitetest