Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: torqemada

A few remarks....

On saints and icons:
The 39 Articles decry the "Romish doctrine" of the veneration of saints as well as of relics and images. This does not mean we cannot have icons and that we should not remember great saints, just that we should avoid the "Romish" doctrine concerning them. One could argue this item was written prior to key Roman councils that clarified Roman dogma and is therefore no longer necessary, but the popular piety exhibited in many Roman parishes and the growth of the cult of Mary (derisively dubbed "Mariolotry" by some) underscore the need to keep this particular article around.

On apostolic succession:
Apostolic Succession is not merely an elaborate ordination genealogy. It is adherence to the Apostolic Faith. Episcopalians erred by concerning themselves more with maintaining the historic line and less with making sure the person being ordained believed, practiced and taught the Faith Once Delivered. As a result, Gene Robinson is considered "valid" whereas Billy Graham is not. Whom would you rather have celebrate Communion in your parish?

On the BCP:
Archbishop Cranmer's most important reform may have been making Scripture and worship readily available to the people. That was accomplished by translating the material into the proper language of the day (without compromising theology) and using the most efficient medium for its dessimination. How does using Shakespearian English in the liturgy today compare with using Latin in the 16th century?


5 posted on 07/18/2006 4:34:52 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bobjam

Anglicanism's schizophrenic theologies never have made any sense to me.

I find it untenable to have a Church where co-religionists are divided between apostolic Catholic beliefs on one hand and Protestant Evangelical ones on the other.

This High Church/Low Church split in some ways created the prime atmosphere for what has been happening in Anglicanism for the past 40 years.

As a Lutheran convert to Catholicism, I firmly believe the two creeds are firmly different religions. How Anglicans have historically tried to be either here nor there makes little sense to me. I find it completely illogical.


6 posted on 07/18/2006 6:27:47 AM PDT by pravknight (Liberalism under the guise of magisterial teaching is still heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson