Well, it's an interesting phenomenon that I find on this site.
We spend a lot of time bashing the MSM and even more bashing the usuallly-leftist rags spawned in England.
Yet, when presented with information that we want to read or believe it, we choose to believe it, taking anecdotal evidence as fact. "Studies" themselves are so biased, slanted and "made-to-order" that we brush them off without a blink. But, the stuff that we would like to see as truth, we buy in a minute.
So, based on what I have seen and heard from vicars over the years, and from Epicopalians in general, my opinion stands.
Mind you, it's only an opinion, but I can't change it based on articles like these. I would have to meet, know and read a WHOLE lot more to change my mind about Episcopalians feeling that St. George was too macho.
I did see a documentary on the chapel gift shop at Windsor Castle. It WAS this year. The gift shop was to be re-done to bring it up to date with modern times.
They brought in a designer to give the shop a logo for the remodeling and other stuff. The logo HAD to be St. George, of course.
They used a logo based on one of the window pictures of him. So, they built up a nice, large logo and package to present to the committee that decided on such matters.
The eldest vicar, a man OBVIOUSLY of major rank, gave his opinion of the logo: (paraphrasing, but using his own words) "Too effeminate, too androgenous and it would not do."
So, the designer took a copy of a small statue in the gardens. It was one that showed a REAL male, like he would REALLY look in a stylized version of battle. The vicar approved of THAT St. George.
THAT is anecdotal too, of course, but the vicar was quite firm in his condemnation of the an effete St. George. That was another adjective he used to describe the first St. George.
THIS vicar was definitely a male, albeit a very old one.
I have no personal knowledge of the leanings of the CofE clergy; I would hope that the vast majority of them are exactly as you describe.