The scholarly article stands by itself to make a good and worthwhile read to help better our devotion to St. John Fisher, which if you had wanted to make THAT point, it would have been terrific, but throwing in the comment on the consecrations was muddying the waters.
Throwing in the disclaimer logically leads to the questions I wrote. What else could one think? The absurdity of the questions only seeks to bring forth the absurdity of the disclaimer.
LOL! It wasn't a disclaimer for the article per se, but to inform the knee-jerk people who might say, "Oh! Why are you reproducing this!? This is from Angelus, don't you know? This is a schismatic publication! Don't read it!"
Now, those are the people who are acting absurdly.