Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
And please support the claim that all processes, or even some, are evidence of no intelligent design.

To do this, you must establish a falsification criteria for the claim. If no falsification criteria exists, then the claim cannot be evaluated.
668 posted on 06/19/2006 7:26:44 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
To do this, you must establish a falsification criteria for the claim. If no falsification criteria exists, then the claim cannot be evaluated.

No, your turn. You disprove it. You've been asked to provide support for your statements and you have not. You can at least return the courtesy to others that you demand of them. Otherwise it would be reasonable to conclude that your lack of response, and answer, and support of your positions, indicates that there is none. That it either cannot be done or that you are incapable of doing it.

Since you cannot provide examples, supported by anything, that order can arise from non-order without intelligent intervention, then it can be reasonably concluded that no such examples exist and there is no basis for coming to that conclusion. Deciding that something happens with no basis for it is irrational. It is not scientific to come to any conclusions with no evidence to support it.

680 posted on 06/19/2006 7:59:25 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson