[taxesareforever]

Your statement implies that a process or object that is not "intelligently designed" is "random".

No, you turn the whole thing around. My statement implies that snowflakes are a matter of intelligent design. How else could there be billions upon billions of snowflakes without two being the same. I do not believe anything in creation is random. It is all from Intelligent Design. One can state that things are random but that is only because the real answer to the cause undermines their idea of how things came into being in the first place.

[Dimensio]

No, you turn the whole thing around. My statement implies that snowflakes are a matter of intelligent design. How else could there be billions upon billions of snowflakes without two being the same.

You are invoking a logical fallacy by suggesting that your personal incredulity is evidence against an event.