Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

"This appears to be a "poisoning the well" fallacy, where you use an attack upon my character as a substitute for providing evidence for your claim."

***The statement has absolutely no bearing on your...."character" as it is, as you are assuming this or making a feeble attempt to provoke the writer to a more aggressive use of words in the next post. It also, would be used to get the mods to believe that the statement, although valid was a personal attack when it was nothing of the sort.


623 posted on 06/17/2006 3:10:42 AM PDT by tgambill (I would like to comment.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies ]


To: tgambill
The statement has absolutely no bearing on your...."character" as it is, as you are assuming this or making a feeble attempt to provoke the writer to a more aggressive use of words in the next post. It also, would be used to get the mods to believe that the statement, although valid was a personal attack when it was nothing of the sort.

Taxesareforever claimed that I would not accept any evidence that supports intelligent design. Such a claim requires a presumption of my character.
629 posted on 06/17/2006 2:27:08 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson