Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/31/2006 7:33:24 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ahadams2; meandog; gogeo; Lord Washbourne; Calabash; axegrinder; AnalogReigns; Uriah_lost; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 05/31/2006 7:35:03 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar

I've noticed a growing trend of calling all heresies "Gnostic." This is quite inaccurate, especially referring to the homosexual agenda.


3 posted on 05/31/2006 8:21:45 PM PDT by Zero Sum (Marxism is the opiate of the masses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar
All of this is characteristic of “progressive” Christianity.

First, I have no idea who Rev. Dr. Jay E. Johnson is or how he managed to chew through the leather straps. I did a quick search of his name and discovered that he's a member of the "California Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry" and a signer of the organization's absurd "Declaration of Religious Support For Equal Civil Marriage Rights". Here's a taste:

We affirm the right to freedom of conscience in this matter: we recognize that the state may not require religious groups to officiate at, or bless, same-gender marriages. By the same token, a denial of civil recognition dishonors the religious convictions of those communities and clergy who do officiate at, and bless, same-gender marriages; the state may not favor the convictions of one religious group over another to deny individuals their fundamental right to marry and have those marriages recognized by civil law.
I've never understood why some liberals attempt to make their arguments from a Biblical standpoint. The fact that they're willing to subvert the Word to further their idiotic agendas shows that they don't believe what it says or consider it sacred. And if that's the case why bother? Why don't they simply proclaim the Bible irrelevant and a hindrance to "progress"?
4 posted on 05/31/2006 8:26:21 PM PDT by Jaysun (Cold showers turn me on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar

Ping to read later


5 posted on 05/31/2006 8:33:59 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson