Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2006 2:54:05 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ahadams2; meandog; gogeo; Lord Washbourne; Calabash; axegrinder; AnalogReigns; Uriah_lost; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 05/22/2006 2:54:57 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar
He said he "cannot stand silent when persons are penalized about something I believe they can do nothing about—their sexual orientation."

"I do not believe that the Jesus who was on the side of the weak and the persecuted would accept the treatment generally being meted out by us Christians to an already persecuted minority," Tutu said.

No wonder Tutu never shows up in any meeting of all the other African Anglican leaders. They won't put up with him. Tutu thinks it's all about HIM, and what HE believes. The Bible is useful for plucking random verses to use out of context, and the verses he doesn't like don't mean anything.

3 posted on 05/22/2006 4:33:33 PM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar
The real reason "Why Conservatives Will Lose At General Convention" is because Conventions are useless. There are two reasons for that.

First, Conservatives always try to win in one fell swoop at General Convention, but they haven't got sufficient political acumen to achieve it, and no longer have the votes, either.

In contrast, the revisionists have long followed a pattern of patient incremental gains within the bureaucratic structure of the church, each of which is then formalized at convention -- by their conveniently placed delegates -- as a fait accompli.

The Conservatives are guilty of several things. First, they've fallen into the trap of "not wanting to seem mean," and thus allow people to fudge on the truth -- which is the precondition for the revisionists' strategy of incremental gain. Conservatives tend also to be too busy with other things, to pursue incremental gains of their own; and they're generally predisposed to desiring a Big Win, and thus refuse to accept incremental gains when they're available.

4 posted on 05/22/2006 7:30:22 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination" (Leviticus 18:22).

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them" (Leviticus 20:13)

"For this cause God gave them up into vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet" (Romans 1:26, 27)

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! The sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, passive homosexual partners, practicing homosexuals, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, the verbally abusive, and swindlers will not inherit the kingdom of God. Some of you once lived this way. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)

So... what am I missing that Tutu is apparently enlightened of??? I read: homosexuality is clearly a sin. Nonetheless, homosexuals are just as capable of receiving grace through Christ as the rest of us sinners.

Their problem: they do not accept that they are sinning, and Tutu and others like him sanctify their misconception.

The result: Tutu is a false prophet and non-repentant homosexuals are damned.

5 posted on 05/23/2006 11:59:53 AM PDT by Army MP Retired (There Will Be Many False Prophets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar
The problem I see with religious conservatism is that the basic, common sense morality of the Bible is expressed in terms of faith in God or Jesus rather than on the merits of the issues. Whenever God is invoked as the reason for being, or doing, it colors the issue to the secular elements. As a conservative, but an atheist, I see the merit in the morality contained in the Bible, and I prefer to be in the company of Christians rather than liberals.

Liberalism, likewise, is a religion of requiring faith. It, however, has no book, is bankrupt in the morality department and not easily defended without the invoking the blind faith so often displayed by prominent liberals.

Christians are good people. Liberals aren't. Christians can support their arguments without invoking their religion. Liberals can't. I think the focus by Christians on God and faith rather than the basic merit of their morality hurts them.
6 posted on 12/08/2006 4:36:41 AM PST by wgflyer (Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson