I have responded. I don't find that he has rejected his prior teachings that it was not the blood of Jesus.
Did he reject his false teaching on that and I missed it?
I know he has recanted on some other mistakes he has made........
Point out the heresy in post 52. That is his position. In his own words. Not taken out of context.
There isn't anything heretical in there is there? Perhaps that is because he was quoted out of context by your fundamentalist buddies or because they were looking for heresy where there was none.
Perhaps he did not recant because he had nothing to recant. Perhaps it is because he really believes what he said in post 52.
Now, yes or no:
Is there anything heretical in MacArthur's position in post 52?
Yes or no?
If yes, please point it out. If not, please apologize.