Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; Full Court; AlbionGirl; Alex Murphy; suzyjaruki; HarleyD; tenn2005; ...
Dr. Eckleberg:How different is His actual human blood than the supposed relic of His foreskin? It's all magick.

For our discussion........

73 posted on 05/24/2006 12:41:30 PM PDT by Full Court (¶Let no man deceive you by any means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Full Court; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe
I knew of a strap of his leather and a nail of His Cross being relics, but his foreskin? For goodness sake, say it isn't so?

On to the subject at hand, I do think the shedding of His Blood is quite a bit different than the fetid business of hawing his foreskin. For God's sake, I feel like hurling just writing that sentence!

"Take this cup, and drink of it, for this is my Blood." The shedding of Christ's Blood, that is, the Blood itself is very significant, in and of itself, though I do agree that it was His Death that was redemptive.

78 posted on 05/24/2006 12:57:47 PM PDT by AlbionGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson