Then I suspect that in your Bible there is an Apocrypha section? If it was good enough to include, like study notes, in the KJV1611, then I suspect that it's good enough for you, huh?
Or has some evil new age publisher come along and ripped that section out of your... oops, excuse me... THE Bible?
By the way, does your KJV correct all the archaic spelling of the 1611? If so, on what authority did the Publishers of your Bible have to change the spelling from the Original English?
Why should I care if the Apocrypha is in my Bible or study notes either.
The translators included them since they were still highly regarded as literature back then, but not sacred literature.
Yet another straw man.
Or has some evil new age publisher come along and ripped that section out of your... oops, excuse me... THE Bible?
The Bible is the Old and New Testament.
Anything else in the Bible is not 'the Bible', including graphs, and lists and study aids, marriage records etc.
But then again you never saw a Bible, since you don't believe one really exists, its just kinda out there somewhere.
By the way, does your KJV correct all the archaic spelling of the 1611? If so, on what authority did the Publishers of your Bible have to change the spelling from the Original English?
Updating the spelling of a word isn't changing the word now is it?
So no one has to get 'permission' for updating spelling.