Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Full Court

Shakespeare was contemporary with the KJV. Do you think that Shakespeare needs to be translated, or do you think the English in his writings is perfectly understandable without explanation?


340 posted on 05/25/2006 7:22:06 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

"The King James Bible was published in the year Shakespeare began work on his last play, The Tempest. Both the play and the Bible are masterpieces of English, but there is one crucial difference between them. Whereas Shakespeare ransacked the lexicon, the King James Bible employs a bare 8000 words—God’s teaching in homely English for everyman."
(Robert McCrum, William Cran, and Robert MacNeil, The Story of English, p. 113)"

http://www.av1611.org/kjv/nivteen.html


376 posted on 05/25/2006 8:14:37 PM PDT by Full Court ("Lord, open the eyes of the King of England")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson