After all, what is the point of (1) posting a 5 year old article and (2) accusing a fellow Catholic of worshipping the Pope - a crude, stupid anti-Catholic slander?
The only purpose is to foment discord and stir up strife.
In a phrase, to promote schism.
Which was exactly my point in the first place. What they advocate is a grave and serious sin, in the same way the Protestant Reformers wounded Christ by rebelling against His Church. Its a focus on what "I" want and what "I" think the Church should be, as if to say that Christ got it wrong.
This Rock agrees with the author's premise about the limitations of Papal Infalliblity, which you seem to miss.
"To respond to the anti-infallibilist, it is important to recall what an ex cathedra declaration is and what it is not. For a papal declaration to be considered ex cathedra, and thereby infallible, the pope must intend to speak to the Church with his full authority as supreme teacher on a matter of faith and morals. Ex cathedra statements are not only rare, but in scope they exclude a great deal. Dr. Hergenroth, in his book on Vatican I, noted that "Not every papal expression, still less action, can be taken to be a definitio ex cathedra. Mere mandates of the pope for special cases, and for particular persons; judgments on individuals resting on the testimony of third persons, and in general on human evidence; declarations and answers to the inquiries of individuals; private expressions in learned works, and in confidential letters—even mere disciplinary decrees—belong not to this category."
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1998/9801fea4.asp