Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: jkl1122
However, I fail to find any qualifications of the baptizer in the New Testament, and that is what matters.

What matters - that there (theoretically) aren't any qualifications found in the NT, or what you personally believe/conclude, based on the omission?

Have you seen the FR thread "You might be a Gnostic if..."?

19 posted on 05/01/2006 9:19:23 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Alex Murphy

If there are no qualifications for the baptizer found in the New Testament, then adding qualifications would be adding to the Word of God, which is wrong.


20 posted on 05/01/2006 9:26:31 AM PDT by jkl1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy

Why did you ask if I read the thread about being a Gnostic?


25 posted on 05/01/2006 12:59:31 PM PDT by jkl1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Alex Murphy
Have you seen the FR thread "You might be a Gnostic if..."?

Do you recommend this thread because you are a Gnostic?

56 posted on 05/01/2006 8:41:17 PM PDT by tenn2005 (Birth is merely an event; it is the path walked that becomes one's life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson