Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DelphiUser
Your understanding of the LDS religion is flawed, at best.

It is the religion I learned at my father's knee, and he at his father's, and he at his father's and he at his father's and he at his father's. It is what I learned in my Baptism and confirmation, my Patriarchal Blessing, my Sunday School, Primary, Mutual, Family Home Evening, Seminary, Stake Conferences, General Conferences, Standard Works, Priesthood Blessings, Family Journals while doing Geneology, and in my Temple Ordinances. It is NOT what I learned in the Bible.

God is already in my life, isn’t if kind of prideful for you to assume he is not and that you can introduce me?

I learned to "always be a missionary" from a very good source ; ) I guess old habits die hard.

Thanks for asking, how’re you today?

Saved by God's grace alone, through faith alone, in Jesus Christ alone! thank you.

110 posted on 04/30/2006 6:56:07 AM PDT by colorcountry (Watch out, you'll be e-banished and sent into e-spirit prison until somebody e-baptizes you by proxy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: colorcountry

In post 104 you said” My understanding of the LDS religion, is it is one of works, pride, and placing yourself in God's rightful position of authority.”

This is why I said, “Your understanding of the LDS religion is flawed, at best.”

>>It is the religion I learned at my father's knee, and he at his father's, and he at his
>>father's and he at his father's and he at his father's. It is what I learned in my Baptism
>>and confirmation, my Patriarchal Blessing, my Sunday School, Primary, Mutual,
>>Family Home Evening, Seminary, Stake Conferences, General Conferences, Standard
>>Works, Priesthood Blessings, Family Journals while doing Geneology, and in my
>>Temple Ordinances. It is NOT what I learned in the Bible.

I do not dispute what your father taught, or did not teach, nor do I dispute the classes you took, the ordinances you performed, Genealogy you researched, Etc. I dispute that it is a religion of pride and usurpation (I’ll handle works later), your understanding is flawed at best, and I am being kind. One who claims to be God’s servant has trouble “Usurping his place as I pointed out earlier, because to take his place is to invalidate any claim of authority from him (That old circular logic thing that’s been going around). Pride is an individual sin, maybe even a wide spread one, but I have never seen it institutionalized in a church, sports teams yes, but a church no.

>>I learned to "always be a missionary" from a very good source ; ) I guess old habits die hard.

Great! Seek to increase the faith of all you meet and teach those in need of knowledge of Christ and I will support you to the end of your days. Come to those with faith, or Questions about a religion you do not believe in with answers, warnings, or information to help them decide to “Go Elsewhere” and we have a problem, you and I.

I would never presume to inform others of your faith since I do not believe it myself. I do not care how much history you have with the church, without faith, it is irrelevant. For you to present your self as a reliable source of something you do not believe in is to lie to the very people you claim to be helping. (Ends never justify the means, the means must justify themselves) The only time that “Warnings” in matters of faith would be acceptable is if you knew that we did not believe what we teach.

You Cannot prove that I do not believe what I say about my church for I am the only one who truly knows what I believe, and if I behave the way I say I will, you must take my word for it, or call me a Liar without proof or reason.

Since you have already professed not to believe the LDS faith, please direct any seekers with questions about the LDS to me.
Thank you.

If you will tell me your religious preference, I will do the same for you.

>>Saved by God's grace alone, through faith alone, in Jesus Christ alone! Thank you.

You have accused us of being a religion of works, fine; here is a section straight from the Bible on that:

James 2 14-26

14 What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?

15 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,

16 And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?

17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.

18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.

19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that Faith without works is dead?

21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?

22 Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?

23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.

24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way?

26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

( http://scriptures.lds.org/james/2 )

I am Curious to hear your interpretation of this scripture. Are works as well as faith not required?

I wish you more and more enlightenment until you and I meet at the judgment bar of God.


111 posted on 04/30/2006 1:37:32 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: colorcountry

Um, were still friends right?

That last section from the bible sounds rather harsh on rereading it, I mean this as a discusion of interpetation, not as a personal slam of any sort and if you interpet it as a slam, I apologise, in advance.

DelphiUser


112 posted on 04/30/2006 1:43:16 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson